In the pre-discrimination period of the 13th trial, it was decided to file a prior notice before the plaintiff's performance, which was between the statement of the proponent and his informant where he met her and Earlier, the importer performed the plaintiff's plaintiff, plaintiff's position. Therefore, according to Section 13 of the KP Pre-Impression Act 1987, the student failed to perform the victim, before the importer neither cited Ashdad nor his first request at the time of sending the notice to the defendants. Submitted that the notice was before the court that when the emperor cited his obituary when the notice was written in his presence, the emperor did not, according to law, confirm his intention of seeking it. With regard to Section 13 of the KP Pre-Empty Act of 1987 and its right to terminate its right to dismiss the main plaintiff The RIDEAU
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
