MEHMOOD KHAN ALIZAI versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, ISLAMABAD
Section 8 of the case for possession of immovable property was the plaintiff's view that he was the owner of the suit bungalow and he had spent large sums of money in his pocket to improve and renovate it while the defendant had taken possession of the suit bungalow. Notice was sent to Due to the super-structure suit, the price of the super-architecture of Bengal was Rs.152,895 partially ordered and at the same time the ownership was denied. In his cross-examination, he confessed that his father had obtained the lease on the grant of a 99-year-old land on the land below the bungalow, the admission by the plaintiff petitioner did not invalidate the ownership claim of the bungalow. His father only had a lease hold. The property rights and the case of the claimant applicant could not be better or different than that the owner of the suit property was no other but the central government after the death of the claimant applicant's father, when his inheritance in the form of a bungalow. Depending on his legal heritage, including the applicant, he too enjoyed that status. Holders of the leaseholder on behalf of the plaintiff of the Central Government or licensors for the matter exhibited an extract of the GLR, according to which the Central Government or the Ministry of Defense and earlier the plaintiff was the applicant's late father and Thereafter, the applicant along with his legal heritage plaintiff had less possession of the bungalow because a copy of the petitioner's late father's entry of entry was prepared, under which he confessed that he was a member of the Federal Government. / The Department of Defense owns the cost of this super-structure was estimated by Military Engineering Services 1,52,895
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
