CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR versus SYED ALLO DIN
The suit for declaration of section 11, 12 (2) and section 42 of the OX, R 13 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) was declared ex parte following which, under OIX, R 13, CPC. The ex parte decree will be issued to exclude the defendants' request. Was also excluded, and such dismissal was upheld by the defendants of the Supreme Court and subsequently challenged the previous order because of fraud, misrepresentation and want of jurisdiction. (2). ), The CPC was not extended to a province-administered tribal area suit on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation on the basis that the former Parliament Declaration challenged the declaration on which it was excluded. Again the restriction was imposed by the Judiciary Rule, this case was not stopped under Section 11, OC, R 13, the CPC as the Supreme Court dismissed the application, Maintained, this will not affect the current case because in this case there were only questions under O IX, R 13, CPC which were again. The question of limitation was never taken into account in the case of exploratory fraud, misrepresentation, jurisdiction, and any order or order on the basis of fraud, prior to the amendment of section 12 (2), CPC. The only way to challenge was to enter a civil court. The case filed for the declaration was practicable in all respects and the questions of fraud and misrepresentation had to be considered by the High Court for the convenience of Section 12 (2), CPC. An application under "the declaration suit was changed and revised thereafter."
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
