For the possession of the Section 13 pre-discrimination period, the plaintiff's performance filed two pretrial claims that were decided by the trial court in respect of the suit land, but the appellate court dismissed both cases. Gave. In the witness box, however, she was present in the defendant's petitioner and informant's statements in the contention of the material contradictory statement, which failed to indicate the time and place for the student to inspect the contention, which clearly shows that Did not perform in the quest. According to the law but he made a perplexing story, the plaintiff failed to substantiate the petitioner's notice by presenting his testimony to the petitioner, thus completing the second mandatory toll pursuant to section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Empowerment Act. Was unable to deliver. , 1987 There were clear contradictions in the statements of the plaintiff's witnesses The appellant's appellate court correctly dismissed the evidence, dismissing the cases sufficient r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
