Under Section 6A6A and 1 561, a superdy of vehicles was taken into custody by the police as its driver could not produce any valid documents and an FIR was filed against the driver petitioner, who claimed. It was said that the clean buyer of the vehicle also filed a petition before the Judicial Magistrate dismissed the Judicial Magistrate for the return of the vehicle, but the revision court also rejected the Judicial Magistrate's order dismissing the excise department. Valid taxation records show that the original owner of the vehicle sold the vehicle to someone else , Which made the same purchase through a forensic report on the current applicant's transfer process, whether the vehicle's property mark was genuine or not available on the tampering file, if in the absence of a competing vehicle claimant, If the same was given to the applicant on Superdie, then present it before the trial court on every date. The state will not have to suffer any harm. Should be handed over. The applicant should demand that he not sell or transfer the vehicle to anyone until the judgment of this case, and that the applicant will, when required by the court, present the vehicle in which it is lost The surety bond will be forfeited.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
