Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ versus MUHAMMAD LAL

Definition of the evidence of section 3/24 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Contempt Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974, the fact that the crime was not found vacant by this revolver recovered on the occasion of the accused by the firearms expert was unusual. Was. The reason for the presence of sufficient material on record in the form of ocular evidence is that the casualty has been closely spaced by the victim by the revolver, resulting in a deep connection between the parties and to justify it. There was no deep root rivalry between them. The Shariah court, pointing to eyewitnesses, did not give any reason as to why the accused was not sentenced to death as a prisoner or detainee, but every accused involved in a free fight was responsible for his own actions and in himself. There was no question. The defense suspect caused the death of the deceased, who was unarmed with a revolver, no ground was available to punish the accused. Dit had maintained the circumstances that resulted in the conviction of a convicted felon, who was injured in the incident, did not deserve the punishment of the perpetrator or was sentenced to 20 years of RI for the death. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Risalpur lawyer