Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI DAR

Appeal for appeal against decision of service tribunal delay in section 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, was asked about the validity of the notice due to the lawyer that the appeal for leave Was banned for seventeen days. Applicant's counsel cannot be construed as a reasonable cause for the delay in the notice presented, even if the notice is lost, the applicant's lawyer knew of the declaration of judgment and he was confirmed by the service tribunal under the affidavit. To the office. The lawyer appearing before the service tribunal could not inform the applicant of the decision, as the notice was filed in the wrong place, it will not bring the case to the notice of major error, but it will be a case of negligence. That could not be comprehended. Since the CPC service was not applicable to the tribunal proceedings, therefore should not have been a strict opinion, it was not good, because in the case of delay, in filing for leave for appeal, the limitation law And that should be seen in view of Supreme Court rules, not in view of the provisions in the CPC. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Matli lawyer