Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus HASSAN SHAMSI

Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Sector 6 for the specific performance of delay in the breach of the contract, the concession of amending the law, the effect of the suit is three After four months of filing, no separate application was filed, nor was the plaintiff seeking any confirmation for the delay in Medina, which provided for section 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908, After the amendment was made three years to file the case and through this amendment the filing period was three years. The suit was added for six years, stating that under this amendment the offer of the Limitation Act of 1908 of the previous section 11 Lim3 would not be abolished. Article 113 before its modification was made available to the plaintiff. The provided term was limited for three years and was not legally valid. In the case of the defendant, the new limitation law cannot be considered as prejudicial because the case can be filed after three years as it reserves the right to defend the defendant from time to time under the law. Treatment time was restricted immigration advocates from Pirpai lawyer