EHSAN ALI versus CH. ABDUL HAFEEZ,
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22D Appeals for dismissal of illegal prosecution Appeal for restoration of appeal was filed after more than six months without filing for contempt of appeal, hearing the applicants on their own exposition. Had a history of Despite knowing the date of the hearing not appearing, the Council of Applicants is obliged to inform themselves of the forthcoming hearing in which case the hearing was adjourned, but neither it nor the applicants Made an inquiry regarding the next date of appeal hearing. For more than seven months, applicants for the office could not be excused that their boundaries would begin to run within the time they were aware of the appeal's dismissal, with the application being timed, with a time limit. , Was excluded under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer
