Find a Lawyer

ADIL KHAN versus POST MASTER GENERAL, SOUTHERN SINDHCIRCLE, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (G) and 22A National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (C) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance ( VI (1968), the Appellant / Employees were charged before the National Appeal Industrial Relations Commission on charges of unfair labor / misappropriation of heavy government money by Section O15 employees. Issue of charge sheet against section 22A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, as well as hearing of the petition against him with the object of punishing the activities of the Legal Trade Union. Was gone The petition states that there is nothing in the record to show the action against the employee. The work was started because of the activities of his trade union. The Commission member further found that the employees had received incorrect amount of government money / He has been charged with embezzlement, unless the case is investigated, the administration cannot come to a conclusion about the charge against him. Employees accused of corruption had the right to initiate disciplinary proceedings, issue charge sheets and conduct inquiries to determine whether the charge against employees was valid, requiring that the employer take disciplinary action. Could initiate, reach a logical end, and employees could not be allowed to frustrate / stop such action by merely pleading for trade union activities unless they could prove it. Are not content enough to take action against them famous supreme court advocate from Dir lawyer