Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus S.G.S. PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (G) and 27A National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (C) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders Ordinance) VI (1968), after a notification issued by the employer through section O15 misconduct alleging unfair labor, the suspended appeal was filed before the National Industrial Relations Commission employee, inquiring against him on corruption charges. Responding to the issuance of the notice, the unsatisfactory employer inquired against him in which he was found guilty, The students were the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment of the employer against the employee (Standing Orders) Ordinance, the employer unfair labor practice under Section 15 of the 1968 Act can not be said. After conducting an inquiry and telling the employee the reason, the authority to prosecute the employee against the allegations of malpractice and to make a proper investigation against him is sufficient to conclude that the employee was a General / Secretary Worker \ Union. It was not that the action against him was due to his trade union activities. The employer is in his favor to take any action against the employee for his mismanagement. And the National Industrial Relations Commission had no authority to sit on the appeal and investigate the inquiry process. The employee did not provide any specific example of the employer's unfair practice in his application, except the fact that the employee was the general secretary of the worker. was not enough to form a union The employer's act against the employee was an act of unfair labor. famous supreme court advocate from Wana lawyer