EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION, SAMUNDARIDRAINAGE SUB?DIVISION, FAISALABAD versus MUHAMMAD YOUSUF
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 22A (8) (G) and 22D were filed by the appellant on two grounds for delay in filing the appeal. Firstly, the delay was due to the lengthy procedure of the concerned department and secondly, due to the illness of his lawyer, Paella had taken the delay in the affidavit's affidavit that he was told Due to the formal capabilities of the procedure, it was not requested by the appellant in their application. Delay in explaining details of alleged legal process. In the absence of relevant / necessary details, the delayed application could not be accepted due to the lengthy procedure of the department; the government cannot usually claim the claimant in any way. Describe the essential details of the lawyer's illness, how long he was ill and the nature of the illness, Syed's request was not verified by a lawyer's affidavit, nor any other document, such as a medical certificate, on it. Was placed Record that, in the circumstances, the delay in filing an appeal could not have been sustained, in the circumstances, uncertain. n Circumstantial appeals were dismissed by timely dismissal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer