Find a Lawyer

MATIULLAH versus ISHAQ HAMAD

Section 489F Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Falsely recording the verdict of the defendants' appeal against the trial court, correctly assessing the evidence in its proper context And was praised. And the defunct verdict did not suffer the harassment of any wrong reading or reading of evidence demanding intervention by the High Court when a competent court faced prosecution and a lengthy trial. When acquitted by law, he benefits twice as much as innocence which cannot be bothered by the appellate court, unless it is established by the hard and solid evidence available on the record that such a felony was committed. Was wrong, or led to a serious abortion of justice.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• Sheikh WAJAHAT ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, through Secretary Industries 2013 YLR 2132
• MUHAMMAD YAMEEN v. UMAR ZADA 2013 YLR 2141
• AKBAR KHAN v. WASIL KHAN 2013 YLR 2150
• MUHAMMAD SHAKIR v. Dr. AMANULLAH 2013 YLR 2159
• Mst. MEHR AFZOON v. Mst. KHATOON 2013 YLR 2185
• HUSSAIN ALI v. ELLUM 2013 YLR 2192
• SARFARAZ v. EHSANULLAH 2013 YLR 2203
• LUTF-UR-REHMAN v. Mst. IZAT BEGUM 2013 YLR 2211

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

jobs for advocates from Narang Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes