Section 13 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Section 79 Tables, Proof of Oral Sales Loan Ex-Decree, Filing of Pre-Impression Suit Based on Oral Sales to Plaintiffs Setting Separate Separate Request Separately from the Individual Order The application for the injunction, which was permanently rejected and at the same time, the notice of Talab Ishad was given to the plaintiff without the name of confirming the witnesses, nor to any member of the assembly. Neither a post office clerk nor a postman failed to present the defendant's statement and confirm the witnesses. Demands for Student Assessment Tal Notice was to be presented in the presence of two true witnesses. To prove the notice sought, both witnesses must be investigated. The trial court failed to consider the sale deed which was not proved. When the plaintiff denied the sale by the seller and the seller, the proprietor had to prove to the same trial court that he wanted to see if the sale had taken place and to maintain the injunction filed in violation of this prerequisite. Examining the question of keeping. No restriction will be imposed against such a decree
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
