In the Section 2 30l murder trial, the accused was tried and sentenced to death. Upon filing an appeal against his conviction and conviction by the accused, the appellate court set aside the unlawful sentence and sentence, and returned the case with the direction to investigate the accused. According to the medical board and according to the law, the board was charged with advancing the case, and according to the medical board, the accused was suffering from parvina schizophrenia, a major mental illness and was to be treated. In a secure unit of the jail, the trial court postponed the trial until the accused's recovery from illness, after which the medical board of the complaint submitted a report on the fitness of the accused, according to which the accused committed his crime. Was in a position to understand the nature of Under the disputed order, the accused applicant's de novo trial began when the security was registered when the accused was not mentally retarded, the affected order was against the law, and it was bound to be validated, During the previous trial, the accused was not examined by the Standing Medical Board, whether they understood it or not. Following the court action, and the remand of the case or not, the accused was declared paranoid schizophrenia, a major mental illness, by the Standing Medical Board. And the board was of the opinion that he could not understand the court's proceedings and could not defend himself, the trial de novo trial approved by the trial court, in the circumstances, was in accordance with the law, in which the Intervened
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
