Section 13, 31 and 32 students filed a notice before the limitation plaintiff's performance, which was dismissed with due diligence and for a period of one hundred and twenty days due to non-compliance with the terms of the Talks. Will be calculated from the date of verification. In connection with the issuance of a public notice under section 32 of the Pre-Impression Act 1987 of the Revenue Officer, there is no alliance with the period of limitation set by section 31 of the aforesaid Act for the filing of the former. Was. The imposition suit was banned in connection with the sale of the sale by conversion because it established a case for more than 120 days provided for under section 31 of the Act, while the plaintiff requested the applicant to sell the transaction. Knowledgeable but did not intend to do so The findings of the two courts below were in accordance with law because jurisdictional jurisdiction could be identified if any misrepresentation, non-reading of evidence or invalid e-plaintiff review was denied. Is
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
