Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus THE STATE

Nine days after the arrest of the accused for adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (3) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13E Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 103 and 165 The delay was disclosed through prosecution when the accused was in police custody and the recovery was made from the accused's home, where his family members also resided, in which case, the prosecution could not be declared in the special custody of the accused. Did not file a station diary to confirm its version that the police station had departed to retrieve the police suspects. The accused, who was allegedly recovered from the accused, was not shown at the time of recording his statement under section 342. The PC revolver has either been sealed or not sent to a ballistic expert. Those who supported recovery in the central case, urged immediate recovery, of the two police advisers during the rehabilitation process, only one was investigated by the prosecution, who was a sharp friend of the complaint. No reason has been offered for why the other adviser was seriously violated the provisions of Sections 103 and 165, CC CC Prosecutor Shin was convicted and failed to prove his case. Against the suspects beyond reasonable doubt, the decisions of the courts were set aside by the High Court in review. ask a advocate free from Chowk Azam lawyer