Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM QURESHI versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 319 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 439 Review Petition The trial court had framed the questioning charge under Section 312, PPC instead of Section 302, PPC and the clear allegations contained in the FIR Had completely ignored and repeated the matter. In the interim challan and following the police officers who rescued their comrades, the policemen were required to present all evidence gathered in connection with the commission of the crime before the court and they withheld the evidence and the responsibility of the trial court. Could not accept. And that too, because of some of the statements made under section 161, to the extent that the specific allegation in the FIR was dismissed, the CCPC, which had a limited value and could not be treated as evidence, was actually charged. Was entitled to use such statements in the lawsuit. Conflicting and contradicting the complainant, but using such statements as the basis of the accusation was a parable exemplified by the investigating officer's attempt to go out of his way to protect his comrades. The move in which the case was dealt with by the trial court was also dismissed by the High Court trial court. In the circumstances, it was ordered to be charged. And subsequently the review request was granted to proceed with this trial. top advocates from Guddu lawyer