Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 337H (2), 459 and 511 guarantees, not specifically anywhere in the grievance of the complainant in the FIR It is reported that the accused knew about it. After a day's delay, the complaining party had filed an FIR. If the complainant knew the names of the accused persons, he had to go to the police station immediately to file the FIR and the delay, likely with the F. There was no justification for entering the IR. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that at one time the complainant used the delay of eleven days in the arrest of the accused in consultation, the prosecution did not specify this and the arms recovered from the accused were sent by the specialist prosecution. Was not the weakest evidence and he injected elements of suspicion in his own version, thus, the case of the accused, had become a matter of further investigation. They were admitted on bail, in order to approve the e-bail jobs for advocates from Wan Radha Ram lawyer