Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRSHAD versus ALEEMUDDIN

Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 and 19, seeking to post a written statement keeping the tenant aside, which appeared through his lawyer after the publication of the notice in the newspaper, the tenant hearing Failed to submit written statement to 's postponed history. The petitioner was again requested to file a further written statement in the application and the landlord was instructed to enter the affidavit in ex parte proof against the tenant to place the earlier part order approved against him. The application was also rejected by the rent controller and filed. To provide the tenant with a copy of the affidavit filed by the landlord and to check with the landlord, their testimony was also rejected by the tenant controller. There was nothing sanctioned against the tenants in the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 provided that if a tenant fails to file a written statement then the previous action should be taken after the tenant has passed the order. They will be prevented from participating in future proceedings, if no good case was presented for their hearing. The eviction sought against it should at least allow the landlord to examine it in order to refuse to waive their lien even though the tenant failed to file a written statement and the basis for this Was not considered good for the purpose of setting up. Putting aside the previous action order, it has to approve the previous action order top advocates from Madinah lawyer