BAZAR GUL AFRIDI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, ISLAMABAD
Arts 199, 245 (3) and 247 (7) Constitutional Armed Forces Applicable to Civil Power Aid in Federally Administered Tribal Areas by Armed Forces in Federally Administered Tribal Areas Attempted to override imposed curfew. The Judicial Commission and the compensation to civilians who were killed or suffered during the war on terror, in this case the dual constitution of the High Court constitutional jurisdiction was imposed by the Constitution. In view of the common bar previously included in Article 247 (7). ) The Constitution on matters relating to the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and secondly, Article 245 (3) of the Constitution specifically imposed sanctions on those areas where the Armed Forces were working with the help of the Civil Power Judicial Commission. The composition was not in the circle. Neither the High Court nor the High Court's domain can instruct the Armed Forces to lift the curfew from the AP Article Article because it deals with a war strategy in the field that was not controlled or constituted by the courts. It was the job of the field commanders who could develop and implement the strategies in the field, depending on the circumstances and circumstances. The High Court directed federal authorities in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas to provide a forum for lodging complaints regarding civilian casualties and damages that would investigate the authenticity of the matter. The High Court directed the authorities to treat the victims equally according to the government's policy after verifying the loss and allow different petitions. The same
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
