Article 497 Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 147, 148 and 149 of Katil Amad, disorderly assault, assault with a deadly weapon, unlawful assembly, refusal to prosecute in which the High Court directed to comply. ? After a certain period, some of the prosecution witnesses are pending investigation. The effect was earlier rejected by the High Court in which the accused was ordered to go to trial within two months, but the trial The hearing did not come to an end at that time, all of the prosecution's witnesses were examined. Except for those whose evidence was to be recorded in a day or two when the testimony of two or three witnesses was pending, then the court should neither approve nor dismiss the accused. The trial did not end at the time given by the prosecutor. The High Court but the defense party was equally responsible for not ending the trial as the case was adjourned on two or three occasions. The trial court refused to grant bail in such circumstances to end the trial within a month.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
