Section 42 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), section 24 (7) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), sections 42 (7) and 184 of the suit, consequently let the scope of the declaration without relief. Discovery of facts challenged by courts. The absence of a shopkeeper at the age of thirty-two years after the mutation was confirmed and the effect of the mutation was confirmed in 1924 and was then in the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1877 and under section 24 (7) of the said Act, on mutation. There was no need to obtain the shopkeeper's signature / thumb impression or the presence of the shopkeeper at the time of the declaration of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967. Under the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, protection was protected by the provisions of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, the respondent was not in physical possession and claimed no abolition. Cannot declare mere honor without asking for possession because the consequent relief decision and the decisions of the two courts were not practicable due to misinterpretation and non-reading of the evidence and, by overturning the decisions and orders of the courts, the defendant The High Court dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
