Find a Lawyer

GOHAR AYUB versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ

A IX, R 6 Ex parte decree, setting aside the scope of the trial court's request for dismissal of the applicant's request without having to record evidence when it was not personally presented. The defamation lawsuit was filed. Should not be heard in favor of the applicant and should be provided with evidence and the opportunity to pursue your case. An unidentified injunction was made and the trial was adjourned to trial court after the applicant had the opportunity to present his evidence in support. Their claim was accepted on appeal

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• SAYYAR v. State 2015 PLD 157
• ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA v. ABDUL ALI 2015 MLD 157
• ABDUL KHANAN v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 PLC(CS) 159
• ABDUL QAYYUM v. Mst. ASMA EJAZ 2015 CLC 162
• RAZA MUHAMMAD v. JAVED KHAN 2015 MLD 168
• GHAFFAR ALI v. State 2015 PCrLJ 169
• BAZAR GUL AFRIDI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence, Islamabad 2015 PLD 169
• SAMI ULLAH KHAN v. Sheikh TAJ MUHAMMAD 2015 PLD 175

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

us immigration advocates from Eminabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes