Find a Lawyer

NAVEED KASIM versus FAROOQ KHAN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 (3) Removal of employees who were employed as an auxiliary to the job, began the activities of the trade union, in order to secure the rights of themselves and other workers. Enraged, who first stopped the employee at the gate and was subsequently removed from the job without a written order, neither presented nor filed a response to the complaint despite numerous delays. , The employer had failed to appear without any good reason, the complaint of the complaint filed by the employee was complete against the employees. As it turned out, he was removed from the job because of his trade union activities, his complaint request against his dismissal order was rightfully granted and he was entitled to all the benefits. Was ordered to re-enter with. us immigration advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer