MATEEN AHMED KHAN versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, 2ND SINDH LABOUR COURT,KARACHI
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and the request for the re-establishment of complaints regarding the deployment of 25 employees were rejected by the employer and were filed by the employer against the termination of his service. That the employee was not retained because the employee was not an employee appointment order. The senior secret staff cadre was posted as the stores officer and according to this ability he was required to perform his duties at such locations in Pakistan because the employee's job description from time to time required that the employee be supervised and supervised. Was in control of it. Department heads, supervisors, assistant supervisors; drivers and general duty workers who are required to perform duties said that functions cannot be categorized into labor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
