Find a Lawyer

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN versus EVER GREEN INDUSTRIES (PVT.)

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and 25 the employment of a complainant's requesting employee's employment service were terminated on the grounds that he had absent himself from duty because of his The main responsibility of either was administrative because it was resisted. Or the caretaker he was not a worker and the Labor Court had no jurisdiction to entertain his complaint request. The employee admitted in his own affidavit that he had requested the workers' hunger-free gate. Recommended to leave and he signed the document as a production. The manager employee also trained workers at various times and providing workers with training did not come into manual labor. Evidence on the record proved that when the employee's services were terminated, he was not engaged in manual labor. ? female advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer