Find a Lawyer

SHAFI MUHAMMAD versus GLAXO LABORATORIES PAKISTANLIMITED, KARACHI.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 (3) Request for Complaint Controversy regarding the date of birth, which was retired at the age of sixty, denied the retirement order that its date. Birth is in accordance with the municipality certificate. 17 7 was in 1943 and not on 31 12 1935, on which he retired, the employee also claimed that in a letter sent to the employer on 11 11 1974 he asked the employer to correct his date of birth. He said that the letter had been correctly retired on the basis of the date of birth as mentioned by the employee at the time of receiving the job if the job was born in 1974. If no action was taken on the filing for correction, the employee should have taken further steps, but instead he remained silent for about twenty-two years and The complaint was filed in 1996, which it should have filed in 1974. For more than twenty-two years in fueled his complaints in the F Labor Court, his application was rejected over time and he did not live up to his qualifications. list of supreme court advocates from Ambela lawyer