RAJA SHAHPALL KHAN versus AZAD KASHMIR TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUZAFFARABADTHROUGH CHAIRMAN
Sections 48, 49, 50, 52 and 65 of the Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance 1965 require the issuance of a route permit or certifying the route permit The provisions of the law contained in the West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance 1965, which relate to the grant or Root permits. In Azad Kashmir, the permits issued by the authority had to be observed before counseling, all of which was required when issuing a route permit through the regional or provincial transport authority in Azad Kashmir when exchanging on a route. Had to be verified or observed. The permits issued by the external authority were in accordance with the relevant provisions of sections 48, 49, 50 and 52 of the Ordinance, which were mandatory in nature, and strictly before further authorization or counseling on the authority's permit. Will be complied with. There should be publicity outside Azad Kashmir so that for those who already had permits till the issue was publicized / publicized, no representation was possible because no one on the permits issued by the authority outside AJK Could not detect the response signal too.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer