MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN versus MST. MANSHA
The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 Section 126 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the Appellate Court below for the cancellation of Articles 42 and 44 suits gifts has been upheld that the two counters of the claimants / appellants. The suit should have been consolidated and decided together and that the legal representatives should be brought on record in one suit should they be brought to the record in another suit, in appeal, the result of the record It is said that there was no order to show that there were ever two suits. The stable High Court had observed that stability had to become an express after stabilization when the two issues had to be dealt with simultaneously, but both said the elements were missing in this case and that the interim orders had been freely recorded in this case. There was no appeal and there was no stability of the suit record, which clearly showed that the suits had not been consolidated at any stage. We are not vulnerable in any way, the appeal cannot be interrupted by the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer