QAMAR ZAMAN versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MIRPUR
Civil Procedure Code Order III and Applicant O III, R2 Power of Attorney Execution and Appellant's Limitation on the Accepted Agents of CPC, who had built the house on the allotted plot, filed through his lawyer. The writ petition challenged the land allotment in front of the respondents in favor of their land, claiming that the land was open to the residents of the area and could not be allotted in writing by the High Court. It was excluded that the appellant's counsel did not have the authority to tile the writ petition title. The power of attorney authorized by the appellant in favor of his lawyer is clearly communicated to the appellant in respect of the allotted plots and it is stated that the attorney will take care of the plots and file requests etc. or the executive. / May take legal action on behalf of the Appellant or defend the proceedings against it. Before any authority or any court, appellant did not have the widespread use of physiology in the power of attorney to include power. To challenge the controversial open space allotment, the High Court had, in the circumstances, rigorously rejected the writ petition on the ground that the appellant's lawyer had no authority to file the writ petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer