Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus THE STATE

The trial court adopted the joint recording of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13, and 20 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 428, 356 and 360 in appreciation of the evidence. The statements of these two female witnesses were not legally justified, and these cases are subject to additional evidence, therefore, the Shariah court adjourned the trial and sentencing the accused to trial. Was not bound and used correctly. Under the force of section 282828, the statements of the PCs of the witnesses in the criminal case had to be recorded separately in accordance with sections the356; Since the CCPC had no concept in the law to record the joint statements as the trial court did = neither the criminal procedure nor the law provided for this testimony or any other law in a criminal case. The women witnesses involved should be jointly examined. The Shariah court correctly found that the two female witnesses were examined in the criminal case as was the evidence of the law and the procedure under criminal procedure. I had lawsuits under trial and a joint statement of two female witnesses in this case I can not be sad. The statement or law of one witness is considered as another decision of the court in which the trial court was directed to record the statement of one of the female witnesses so that the statements of the relevant witnesses were made. Must be recorded by a trial court. The relevant law appeals were dealt with accordingly power of attorney advocate Daska lawyer