Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM FARID versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF


A. XXIII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition After the filing of an oral petition, the plaintiff, on account of subsequent events, resigned the same on the oral plea that came after the case. Permission to file a fresh case was granted by the court, and a fresh case was filed by the defendant in the amended jurisdiction in the lower appellate court's order of dismissal was affirmed on the ground that the defendant's The case cannot proceed because of subsequent events because the defendant seized it. Decisions regarding the legal status of the plaintiff in both courts were in accordance with the law. The plaintiff withdrew the case five years later because of a subsequent incident. The High Court awarded the plaintiff a sum of Rs. Paid Rs

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.