SHAUKAT LQBAL versus MUSSARAT AFZA
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 199 LA Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Resolution Requesting to remove a constitutional application from a residential authority on the basis that the applicant's father had been removed from his residence on the ground that the applicant's father was the community. Was built as the center of The funds provided by the provincial government's constitutional application were filed by the petitioner against the High Court Act and the proceedings of the occupation of the house depend on the note written on the copy of the authority declaring it without legal authority. For the year 1992 for 93 it became clear that a community center was built, in addition, two affidavits were presented by the authority to justify its settlement because the community center. The scheme was approved, in the name of the applicant's father, it did not mean that the public funds No amount of expenditure was spent on the construction of ho, the use of the jambandi prepared by the authority was made by the copy of the jambandi prepared by the applicant and there was no such note in the affidavit. It was not established that the applicant's land had failed to demonstrate the MGT in the matter of authority. The writ petition was used with the consent of the Center for the Community, a constitutional petition against the authority's action was properly accepted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sidhnoti lawyer