Find a Lawyer

SABIR versus THE STATE

Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Sections 403 and 561A Customs Act (IV 1969), Sections 156 (1) (89), 157 and 178 of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 8 9, C, 14 and 15 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 of the 15th (1) (89) of the multiple trial for the same offense against the accused. A case has been registered under, 157 and 178, a challan in the Special Judge's Court upon completion of investigation under Customs Act, 1969 and Sections 6, 7, 8, 9C, 14 and 15 under the Drug Substances Act 1997 Submitted (Customs and Anti-Trafficking) while the other has a Special Judge (Anti-Narcotics) Submitted, the accused was prosecuted and the special judge, the customs suspect, was subsequently sentenced by a special judge, anti-narcotics, for trial of a crime under Section 8 and 9C of the Control of Drug Subjects. Asked. , 1997 The legitimate accused was twice prosecuted for the same offense as the one that A ccused violated two laws, the Customs Act, 1969 and the Narcotic Sub Metals Control Act 1997, on the same accused The Act could not be prosecuted twice, though it violated two laws by one of its acts, the second case was declared invalid under Article 13 of the Constitution. Pakistan (1973) as in section 263 and section 403 of the General Clause Act, 1897, in such cases the PCMAN test was whether the same evidence would maintain the conviction under both laws and the words would be the same. A crime will mean crime. The case against the accused was drug trafficking for which he was tried and convicted by a special judge (Customs) and if his case was controlled by the list of advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer