Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus SHOPS RAILWAY, MULTAN

Section 3 (c) and 2 (j) of the Pakistan Railway Police Act 1977 (IX of 1890), Section 3 (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition FIR is canceled by the accused of the police. Was filed against. The word Railway had a special meaning as stated by the Railway Police Act, 1977 and Railway Act, 1890, on the allegation of the station (Railway) that it had obtained employment as a railway employee by submitting false details / degrees. Which has been linked to physical and tangible assets. The Pakistan Railway Police Act is owned by Railway Company Section 3 of 1977 and is specifically concerned with the restoration of law and order on Sub-section (C) Railway and confessing crimes committed in the context of legal definitions. With regard to the physical assets of the railway allegedly by the accused, he did not commit any crime on the railway nor was it related to the general care of the law. And the order on the railway and obviously, therefore, it did not fall under the purview of the police, the FIR registered against the accused in the police station railway was ordered to be terminated. female advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer