ABDUL MALIK versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME
Section 5 Balochistan Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules, 2009, Rear 17 and 9 Constitution of the Arts 18, 25 and 199 Civil Service Ad hoc Appointment of Relax Roles Scope Petitioners, who were serving as Magistrates in the Provincial Lewis Force , The controversial appointment of the defendants to the said post, which was relaxed on the rules and on ad hoc basis as directed by the provincial chief minister and the interior minister, did not allow the provincial legislature to relax the provincial government in any rule. ? The Balochistan Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 2009, whereby the provincial government was made competent to do anything required by the rules, if persons were granted levies on a minister's personal will or on a safari basis. As set forth, the fundamental rights of persons desiring such posts were violated, including their right to desire such posts (Article 18 of the Constitution), to be deemed equitable before the law (Article 25 (1) of the Constitution) and guarantee that they will not be discriminated against (Article 25 (2)) in the present case. Many were made, as before, the rules were relaxed; second, the appointments were made on an ad hoc basis; third, they were done without inviting all interested people and, fourth, no exams. Was taken, so the Constitution, the provisions of Balochistan were violated. Civil Servants Act, 1974 and Balochistan Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 2009, High Court termed respondents' ad hoc appointments void and directed the respondents.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
