Section 302 (b) Definition of AMD Proofs of Immediate Immediate FIR Filed by Medical Proof and Stimulation Accidental Account, Accused and Co-accused Suspects opened fire on the alleged party. The complainant's brother and cousin were killed. Prior to the incident, there was a harsh words exchange between the parties. The incident took place at 8.30pm and the FIR was registered at 9.30pm where the police station was located approximately distance from the scene. 2 was 5km, so it can be said. That the FIR was lodged with reasonable promptness, excluding the possibility of deliberation and consultation, the complainant's presence at the victim's brother and cousin's shop at the time of the incident was quite natural. Yes, even during cross-examination, the complainant's evidence could not be scattered. It could not be ruled out on the basis of its relationship with the deceased only, medical evidence has indicated that the time, location and the direction of the casualties received by the casualties are immediately known to the accused. The seizure was recovered, a forensic examination of the arms recovered from the suspect revealed that he was at work and caught fire. It also endorsed the complainant's statement by the alleged motive behind the incident, which was a harsh word exchange between the victim and the accused prior to the incident, during which the complainant made his statement during the trial. Purpose suspended The investigating officer's vacancy could not be resolved as per the site plan, the incident was too busy
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
