Sections 172, 141,117 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) of the OI, R9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) declare suits 42, 39 and 54, repealing the change and permanent injunction must be invalid. Excluded due to The non-availability of parties and jurisdiction under Section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, while the jurisdiction of a civil court in cases provided under section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 was banned but under this Had some exceptions. Sections 53, 141 and 117 of the Act; and said that the courts below ignored the provisions which confined themselves only to Section 172; no decision was given by the Revenue Authorities in this matter, Rather, the parties are instructed to approach the civil court to determine their rights. In the case of land occupied by the plaintiffs and the defendants, there is a disputed land dispute between the parties, the decision of the parties' privilege in the underground country was to be decided by a court of general jurisdiction on the basis of the absence of a juror. This case should be dismissed. The required party was a wrong decision because under OI, Rule 9, CPC, no case can be defeated due to the parties' misconduct and non-inclusion and the trial court has no one to prosecute. Given the authority for which it was deemed necessary. Determination of the case The High Court dismissed the order of the lower courts and remanded the case to the trial court, directing it to proceed. Accordingly, dancing with the law was allowed
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
