Find a Lawyer

AMIR MURTAZA versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, HYDERABAD RANGE, HYDERABADAN

Police Rules 1934 R128 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 212 Appeal for Employment Exemption The public servant was deposed by the deputy inspector general of police when he was a civil servant. The Assistant Sub Inspector of Police was ordered to terminate his employment by conducting a practical training course only on the report of the Senior Superintendent of Police, which was neither reported to the civil servant nor the civil servant hearing against the charge. Opportunity was provided if there is a deputy inspector general in this report, undoubtedly the official found under police rules, R128 of 1934 Zam had the liberty to relinquish, but such powers could not be used irrationally and record the reasons before the deputy inspector general against the civil servant to submit his order illegally. It was necessary and such reasons must come under the R128 of Police Rules, 1934, that the order of discharge was approved without any request. The senior superintendent of police report was merely mind-boggling, Deputy Inspector General. Service Tribunal against the Police Rules passed under the Order of Police Rules under Offroad Police R128 Appeal stopped. 1934 was eligible because Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and the jurisdiction of the Police Tribunals in the service tribunal under section 4 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 could not be excluded under R128 of 1934. online advocate from Sambrial lawyer