NASIM HAIDER versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, NEW SINDH SECRETARIAT, KARACHI
Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Scenario Intelligence Appeal Limit Government employee opposed to public servants in BP Section 20, claiming that he had passed the department examination in the first instance while anti-government employees later This was what I qualified for and secondly, it was first promoted to BP section 18 and then BP to section 19, while government employees were opposed. Subsequently, a BP Section 18 seniority list was developed that showed a public servant junior to oppose a government employee, which was issued through a notification, but the civil servant did not challenge that seniority list. Because of this, government employees got jobs in history when notification of seniority list was received. Was issued and the civil servant who became the grieving person after issuing the notification should have challenged the notification, but failed to do so when the sanitary list was issued earlier for the employee. It was a great opportunity to file an appeal for. A government employee's complaint is that he will become a grieving person only after the final seniority list has been reported, dismissing the appeal filed against the current seniority list without challenging the former seniority list in which he became a provocation. Especially at that time was bound to be banned. No request for a late condolence petition was filed by a public servant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
