Section 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 12 (1) of the Anti-Terrorism Court case against the validity of the conviction on the AMD appeal. ? The scope of the Scope Prosecution case was that the accused accused abducted the deceased, shifted him to a house, where an illegal jirga took place, then killed and killed a woman accused of killing Kerry. Was transferred before the court. Transfer the case from the trial court to the counter-terrorism court, but before the aforesaid verdict is reached, the trial court acquitted the accused, the litigant is unable to make a decision on the case before the prosecution case. Was, before that, a confessional statement of an accused. Judicial magistrates were pointing out that two innocent people were killed in connection with Carrie Kerry, who justified her request for an anti-terrorism court jurisdiction. The trial court was not competent to prosecute the accused, so the trial court did not apologize for the record of guilty verdict in favor of the accused, which was accepted by the court of competent persons against the verdict, The trial court's decision on the trial was suspended. And under the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, the case has been sent to the Anti-Terrorism Court for trial of nine cases.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
