REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN versus ABDUL MAJEED
Section 42 University of Balochistan Act (III of 1996), Section 3 (3) National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2000), Section 3 (2) Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Section 12 (2), 20 , 115 (1) and its database, issued by the National Database and Registration Authority of the OI, Rr 3, 9 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 3 and Article 2020 for the date of the plaintiff's birth (Additional District and Sessions Judge). Announcement of registration of National Identity Card (NADRA) and its degree certificate issued by the University of Balochistan, Medical Superintendent of the University of Quetta and the respondents of the Dental Surgeon of Government Hospital. On the basis of which the Assistant Controller Examination of such University was taken and the District Registration Officer of this District was registered under Section 12 (2) by the request of the District Judge University, C. The PC was neither adjudicated nor was the District Judge Suu Moto's affirmation of jurisdiction exercised by the High Court. For the High Court when the Registrar tried to amend the date of the date of the High Court affirmation on the basis of the note / decision made 8 months after 3 years of the decision, the plaintiff sought the correction. No deadline has been set to use the recurrence option. Failure to file an appeal against an uncontested judgment / order would not preclude the High Court from using the relevant names of Nanos University and NADRA, but instead of filing a lawsuit against their respective employees through the plaintiffs. Non-inclusive, parties will not be misinterpreted. A fatal defect, but the plaintiff sued the University
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
