MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS ZAKAT AND USHER
Hajj Policy 199 & 189 Hajj Policy, 2012 Constitutional Application Hajj Performing Public Expenditure / Government Treasury Hajj Performance was among the candidates selected by the respondent department for performing Hajj on government expenditure. The ministry sent a check to the religious. Affairs Minister Hajj said that the Religious Affairs of the candidates had refused such payment on the basis that there was no provision of Hajj performance on Hajj policy, government expenditure in 2012, and that That the Supreme Court in its April 8 order, 2012, adopted in Moto Case No. 24, 2010, that under any law, anyone had the right to use public money without justification. Had held that the reliance of the Supreme Court on religious affairs was merely an interim order, and even otherwise. He said that the performance of Hajj is not restricted to the justification of government expenditure in the decision. The applicant was seeking permission to perform Hajj at the expense of the people of the province / country, as these were the people who had spent all the government's expenditure. There was no income law that required the government to send anyone to do Hajj in the government. The money spent with the government was the wealth of the people, and the government was a trustee or "trustee" even though the ministry Relying on religious matters was only an interim order but that did not mean that the article could be ignored. 189 of the Constitution states that any decision of the Supreme Court, to the extent it permits a question of law,
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
