THE STATE THROUGH ASSISTANT ADVOCATE-GENERAL, EX-OFFICIO AND PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BALOCHISTAN versus ABDUL WADOOD
Section 17 (3) Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 265K Final Proceedings Section 265K, CR P. Was acquitted under c. The trial court's merits, despite the fact that the trial was in its final stages, the trial court should not have acquitted the accused using the powers under section 65K, CRPC and Instead, the investigation should have concluded after the investigation of the accused, recording the evidence in defense, and deciding on the merits of the case that the premature acquittal of the accused did not create a double perception of innocence in his favor. , Which needs to be taken into consideration when declaring a bad decision after the need for goodwill, not once the arbitration under section 65, K Based on the breakthrough, the trial was not justified in the trial of PC Trial Section 265, the CCPC and the record of the AC's already being acquitted by the affected High Court for acquittal by the trial court. The order was set aside and remanded to the trial court for judgment on merit.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
