The history of the possession and ownership of property is not mentioned in the appeal against Section 3 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), section 265 K & 417 Proof of Civil Procedure Citizen action related to the legitimate property effect complainant (appellant). Pending, who claimed to be a legitimate owner of the legal property, after filing a complaint against the accused (respondents) under the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005, under Section 265 of the CRPC Filed a plea, which was accepted by the trial court and it was admitted in litigation that the complainant had no record of ownership of the property And he did not bring any material to the record in support of his complaint. The complaint shows that the complainant's grandfather had gifted some part of the property to the accused. Such admission of persons to the complainant obstructed the complainant's way. It did not disclose that when the defendants occupied the land, not to mention such fact in the complaint, illegal disposal of the case. Serious doubts were raised about the application of the Act 2005. The trial court rightly granted the petition filed under Section 265K, CR PC, as the law found that unqualified proceedings should be buried at their inception. An appeal against acquittal of any offense was dismissed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
