Article 8A Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application to maintain the constitutional petition fraudulently obtained in the examination papers by the Bachelor's Degree Complainant (applicant) claimed that the accused (Member Provincial Assembly) was present at the examination. Did not appear in the hall Examination and instead the co-accused appeared and resolved the papers, therefore, the degree was obtained by forgery The conviction of the accused was that the present matter was an election dispute, which was heard by the Election Commission. And that also included a realistic dispute. Not resolved by constitutional application, and that he himself appeared in the examinations and obtained a bachelor's degree, the validation report submitted by the relevant university states that the participant in the original examination form There were photographs of the accused, and the photograph was in the local certificate of the co-accused, while the name of the accused was charged after he was elected co-accused in the public department, which shows that he (the co-accused) ) Are rewarded for their services available on record, which undoubtedly proved that co-accused appeared in exams and forgery. All papers were solved by the source, succeeding in obtaining a degree with fraud, therefore, it cannot be considered a valid degree. In such cases the accused cannot be considered a graduate and the accused is equally responsible. Were. On the documents and submissions by the complainant, the University authorities and the Election Commission were informed about the upholding of the current constitutional petition for fraud and fraud.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013