ABAID ULLAH MALIK versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MIANWALI
OVI, R 17 while referring to the pond in the Pre-emptor for Medina, in the amendment of the case in section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) of the Pre-Impression Suite, Article 135 Pakistan, Article 135. Demand for amendment is made about the time given to the plaintiff in the plaintiff and after recording the statements of the defendant's witnesses, the Proctor Impact Pre-Emmter stated in its lawsuit that it was sold at 10am Learned about and created the motivational moabit. However, in the most important evidence, all the witnesses and the pre-emptor testified at eleven o'clock, the pre-emptor applied under O. VI, R 17, the CPC amended the case to the trial court at that time. Wishfully said, the court revising the petition dismissed the order. However, the trial court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, rejected the order of the reviewing court, claiming the restoration of the previous court ruling that the amendment of the applications should be allowed freely. The names of the date, time, venue and witnesses were required to be mentioned earlier in the field by the pre-emptor in the morning and at 10 o'clock in the morning, after which a written statement was filed by the vendor, Matters were set up and the parties were put on trial until the emperor had no hesitation in modifying the waiver, so that the time given could be changed, the chief, the pre-emptor and According to her witnesses, at 11 o'clock in the morning, the time for making the settlement was suspended; there was a clear contradiction in the time given in the plaint. SK
