Seventh XVI, R 1 Constitution Pakistan, Article 185 (3) Seeking a witness with the permission of the court The scope party is trying to summon witnesses who fail to name witnesses who are in front of an effective trial defendant. Such witnesses refuse to be named in the list of witnesses presented. The defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff / applicant, the prosecutor filed the plaintiff's evidence and the defendant, who was at trial for the defendant's evidence, was given the last opportunity to record his evidence. They filed a petition in the trial court seeking some students. The trial court dismissed the plea of the witnesses through the process of the court, however, approving the amendment by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction, arguing the order of the reviewing court and the order of the trial court's defendants to be reinstated. The defendant testified that the witnesses were summoned. The officials, who wanted to bring with them the official record, which was sufficient for Germany, aimed to resolve the dispute between the parties. That for the purposes of providing justice, legal capabilities should not be allowed to interfere with and prejudice the rights of litigation, and that the provisions of OXVI, R1, CPC were in accordance with the nature and in appropriate cases the court Had power and authority. The valid confession to summon witnesses whose names were not included in the witness list is that the witnesses' list of witnesses to be called in the order of the defendants is to be entered in Order XVI, Rule 1, CPC. I was not present. Counsel for the defendants was not even sure whether the trial was going to take place
