Find a Lawyer

SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL JAIL, ADYALA, RAWALPINDI versus HAMMAD ABBASI

AXXVII A, R1 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 21F case that involves a substantial question on the interpretation of constitutional law Not to issue notice to the Provincial Advocate General Impact High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. 21F was declared anti-security. The Terrorism Act, 1997, as the supreme power of the Constitution and abolished it, converted and allowed the CPC Legal Petition for leave in appeal without issuing notices to the Provincial Advocate General required under O XXVII A. Granted, the High Court decision was set aside and the writ petition was sent to the High Court for its decision after issuing notices to the relevant Advocate General and Attorney General.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• Hakim HABIBUL HAQ v. AZIZ GUL 2013 SCMR 200
• SALMAN AKRAM RAJA v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2013 SCMR 203
• INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER CORPORATION (PRIVATE) LTD. v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2013 PLC 219
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector Sialkot v. Rana ZILADAR KHAN 2013 SCMR 219
• Engineer IQBAL ZAFAR JHAGRA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PLD 224
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2013 SCMR 225
• TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI v. ORGANIZATION OF KARACHI PORT TRUST WORKERS 2013 SCMR 238
• ABAID ULLAH MALIK v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MIANWALI 2013 PLD 239

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

divorce advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes